ABSTRACT
Introducción: El tratamiento biológico es una alternativa para manejar la colitis ulcerativa en pacientes refractarios al tratamiento convencional. Objetivo: Evaluar el tratamiento biológico en pacientes con colitis ulcerativa refractarios al tratamiento convencional en un hospital de 3er nivel de atención. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, longitudinal en pacientes con colitis ulcerativa refractarios al tratamiento convencional y que recibieron tratamiento biológico. Las cortes se evaluaron en tres momentos: estado basal (sin terapia biológica), a los seis y doce meses de inicio del tratamiento biológico. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva para la caracterización de la población en general, posteriormente los tres puntos de corte se describieron con sus respectivas variables. Resultados: Se incluyeron 18 pacientes con edad media de 41,2 años. Las evaluaciones, en un estado basal, a los seis y 12 meses; demostraron presencia de sangre en las evacuaciones y dolor abdominal en 94,4%, 22,2% y 11,1% respectivamente, concentración de hemoglobina >10,5 g/dl en 50%, 83,3% y 88,9%; concentración sérica de albúmina >3,2 g/dl en 72,2%, 83,3% y 88,9% y escala visual endoscópica de Mayo 38,9%, 33,3% y 16,7% presentaron Mayo 2 y 61,1%, 16,7% y 1,7% Mayo 3. La actividad histológica en la evaluación basal llego hasta un nivel severo (11,1%), mientras que en evaluaciones a seis y 12 meses llegaron hasta moderada en un 55,6% y 27,8% respectivamente. Conclusiones: La terapia biológica en pacientes con colitis ulcerativa refractaria demostró mejoría en manifestaciones clínicas, bioquímicas, endoscópicas e histológicas. No se registró remisión profunda de la enfermedad, ni reacciones adversas al tratamiento.
Background: Biological treatment is currently used as an alternative for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in patient's refractory to conventional treatment. Objective: To evaluate biological treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional treatment in a 3rd level care Hospital. Methods: A descriptive, retrospective, longitudinal study was carried out in patients with UC who were refractory to conventional treatment and who received biological treatment. The variables were evaluated in 3 moments: basal state (without biological treatment), at six and twelve months from the start of biological treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize general population, later the 3 states mentioned above were described with their respective variables. Results: Eighteen patients with a mean age of 41.2 years were included. Evaluations at baseline and at 6 and 12 months showed: presence of blood in stools and abdominal pain in 94.4%%, 22.2% and 11.1% respectively; hemoglobin concentration >10.5 g/dl in 50%, 83.3% and 88.9%; serum albumin concentration >3.2 g/dl in 72.2%, 83.3% and 88.9%; the visual Mayo endoscopic scale 38.9%, 33.3% and 16.7% presented Mayo 2 and 61.1%, 16.7% and 1.7% Mayo 3. The histological activity in the baseline evaluation reached a severe level (11.1%), while in evaluations at 6 and 12 months they reached moderate in 55.6% and 27.8% respectively. Conclusions: Biological therapy as a treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis showed improvement in clinical, biochemical, endoscopic and histological manifestations, so far none with deep remission of the disease, no adverse reactions to treatment have been presented.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colorectal surgery has evolved significantly during the last 35 years. The circular stapler and the double stapler techniques have favored the development of very low rectal anastomoses with reduction in anastomotic leakage. The objective of this study is to evaluate the functional results and complication rate of this surgical technique in the Department of Colorectal Surgery at the Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI and at the Hospital Angeles del Pedregal, both located in Mexico City. METHODS: Clinical records of patients who underwent surgery from May 1995 to December 2005 using the double stapler technique and performed by the authors were reviewed. RESULTS: The study included 142 patients, 55 of whom had rectosigmoid cancer resections. Average age was 60.1 years (male predominance 52.05%). The circular stapler most frequently used was CDH 33 (Johnson & Johnson). Average distance between the anal margin and the anastomoses for extended low anastomoses was 3.21 cm (low 7.8 cm and high 13.7 cm), and the rate of anastomoses leak was 3.52%. CONCLUSIONS: Double stapler technique used to treat rectosigmoid pathology is safe, secure and assures intestinal continuity in low anterior as well as extended low anterior resections with primary anastomoses. In those patients with associated risk factors and low extended low anterior resection with primary anastomoses, we recommend performing a protective stoma (ileostomy).